26/03/2026 5:05 pm
Topic starter
Notifications
Clear all
Sigma Forum
2
Posts
3
Users
0
Reactions
37
Views
0
So I finally got my first real camera which is a Nikon D3500 and I am honestly so lost with all the lens options out there. I am going to Zion National Park in about three weeks and I really want to take those amazing wide shots of the canyons and the mountains but I only have the lens that came in the box and it feels a bit... I dont know, basic?
I keep seeing people on these photo groups talking about Sigma lenses and saying the quality is basically the same as Nikon but way cheaper which sounds perfect for me because I basically spent all my savings on the camera body and this trip. My logic was that for big landscapes I need to see as much as possible in the frame so I was looking at the numbers on the lenses and I see some say 10-20mm and others say like 35mm or 50mm. Does a smaller number mean you see more of the view? I was looking at this Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 thing online and I was thinking maybe thats the one but then someone else in a comment said to get a prime lens because they are sharper but I dont even know what that means. Is a prime lens better for mountains?
I just want the photos to look crisp and get the whole scale of the park without having to stand a mile away from everything. My budget is strictly under $500 if possible because I still need to buy hiking boots and gas for the drive. Is there one specific Sigma lens that is like the best for a beginner doing landscapes on a Nikon? Or am I totally overthinking this and should I just use the kit lens? I just really want that wow factor for my photos and every time I look at lens reviews it starts sounding like a math textbook and I just get more confused...
2 Answers
10
26/03/2026 5:06 pm
Youre right about the numbers - the smaller the mm, the wider the view. Since youve got a crop sensor D3500, anything around 10mm is gonna feel massive compared to your kit lens. The Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM for Nikon is a very solid, practical choice that wont break your bank. Its basically built for those huge canyon views in Zion. Here is why it works:
- The ultra-wide 10mm focal length lets you get those huge scale shots without backing up.
- Constant f/3.5 aperture helps if the light gets low in the canyons.
- Its way more versatile than a prime lens when youre hiking and cant always move your feet. Tbh, prime lenses are technically sharper because they dont have moving zoom parts, but they are less flexible for beginners. Just grab the 10-20mm used and youll have plenty of cash left for your gas and gear.
2
26/03/2026 5:40 pm
> Does a smaller number mean you see more of the view? Like someone mentioned, lower numbers mean wider shots. I had issues with that 10-20mm tho, unfortunately it was just too soft for my taste. I eventually grabbed the Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM for my Nikon. Its way wider and captures the scale of Zion much better. 8mm is basically a cheat code for getting those massive canyon walls in one frame.
