22/03/2026 11:50 pm
Topic starter
Notifications
Clear all
0
I have a huge graduation shoot for my cousin and his friends next month in Chicago and I'm honestly panicking about my gear. Im shooting on an EOS R with the adapter and I need that creamy bokeh but my budget is strictly under $1100 used. Im torn between the Sigma 85mm 1.4 Art and the 105mm 1.4 Art. The 105 is a beast but I heard its insanely heavy to carry around all day for outdoor shots? But then the 85 is more classic but maybe less wow factor... I just dont want to regret spending the money and having a sore back. Which one actually looks better for full body shots on a Canon?
3 Answers
12
23/03/2026 12:05 am
Just catching up on this but have you looked at the 135mm? In my experience, the Sigma 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM Art actually hits that sweet spot for full body shots because of the background compression.
- Resolving power is higher than the 85mm at f/1.8.
- It weighs about 500g less than that 105mm brick. Used prices are usually around 800 bucks so it'll fit your budget perfectly.
11
22/03/2026 11:50 pm
I would suggest focusing on the weight factor before committing. Carrying the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art around Chicago all day is gonna be rough on your back. The Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art is a much more practical choice. Its lighter and easier to handle for full body shots while staying well under your budget used. Just make sure to test the adapter balance first.
1
23/03/2026 12:35 am
Honestly, just grab any prime from the Sigma Art line. Theyre super reliable and usually fit your budget used while giving you that pro look you need for those shots.
