So I finally pulled the trigger on a Z6II and I am so hyped for my trip to Tokyo this October! I have been obsessively looking at the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 G2 because everyone says it is the gold standard for a daily driver but then I saw the 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 and now I am second guessing everything.
My logic was that the 28-75 is sharper and obviously better for low light at night in the city but then I read some reviews saying the 28-200 is surprisingly crisp for a superzoom and having that extra reach for street shots or details on temples would be huge. I dont want to be swapping lenses constantly while my wife is waiting for me to keep moving lol. I also looked at the 35-150mm f2-2.8 but that thing looks like a literal brick and is way out of my budget which is around 1100 bucks anyway.
I am really torn because I love the idea of one lens for everything but I dont want to regret the slower aperture when the sun goes down. Is the image quality gap really that noticeable on a 24mp sensor like the Z6II or am I just overthinking the specs? I am trying to keep the weight down too since we will be walking miles every day. Should I stick with the faster f2.8 or go for the range?
Honestly, Tokyo is a marathon. Ive been there three times and trust me, your feet will kill you before your camera does if you carry too much weight. In my experience, for a 24mp sensor like yours, the Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD is basically the ultimate travel cheat code. I know youre worried about the aperture, but the Z6II handles high ISO like a champ. Over the years, I have realized that I miss more shots because I couldnt zoom in fast enough than I do because of noise.
Building on the earlier suggestion, I unfortunately found that superzooms edge sharpness pretty lacking when I tested it tho...