I'm trying to figure out which Tamron all-in-one to grab for my A7III before I head to Japan next month but I'm honestly just getting more frustrated the more I read. I was pretty set on the 28-200mm f2.8-5.6 since everyone says it's the ultimate travel lens but then I saw some forum posts complaining about the lack of VC and the corners being soft at the long end.
So I was thinking maybe there's a better option for my $750 budget? My logic was that the f2.8 would be great for low light but now I'm second-guessing if I'm missing something. Is the 28-200 really the gold standard for a one-lens setup...
Like someone mentioned, the 28-200 is standard, but honestly, be cautious.
Honestly, just go for the Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD. Ive been shooting for years and tried dozens of travel setups, but for a single-lens solution under a grand, nothing touches this one. I took it to Kyoto last year and basically never took it off my camera. People worry about the lack of VC, but your Sony Alpha A7 III has built-in stabilization (IBIS). In my experience, it handles that focal range just fine unless youre trying to shoot at 1/10th of a second at the long end. As for the soft corners... sure, if youre looking at a 400% crop of a brick wall, youll see it. But for real travel photos? Its sharper than it has any right to be.