Ugh okay so I have this trip to Iceland coming up in literally two weeks and I still havent figured out my tripod situation for my Z8. Ive been looking at the Peak Design carbon fiber one because everyone says its the gold standard for travel but then I saw a bunch of reviews saying it vibrates too much with heavier glass like the 100-400mm so now Im second guessing everything. My logic was that I need something light for hiking but if it cant hold the Z8 steady in the wind then what is the point? Then I looked at the Gitzo Mountaineer but that is like way over my $500 budget and I honestly dont know if I can justify $1k on legs right now. I also saw some people recommending Leofoto as a cheaper alternative to RRS but there are so many models I just got lost in the numbers. I need something that can handle the Z mount weight but also fits in a carry-on because I am NOT checking my gear. Does anyone actually use the Peak Design with a heavy Z setup or should I be looking at Benro or something else? I need to pull the trigger on this tonight so it gets here in time for the flight...
Unfortunately, the PD legs were a total letdown for wind stability... dont risk it.
Honestly, you are right to be skeptical about the PD in Iceland wind! I took my Z8 there last spring and those gusts are no joke. Tbh, while the Peak Design Travel Tripod Carbon Fiber is sleek, it really vibrates with the Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S when things get wild. You need something way sturdier for those long exposures. I swear by the Leofoto LS-284C Ranger Series Carbon Fiber Tripod for travel now. It is such a fantastic piece of gear and much more stable because it lacks a center column, which is a huge plus for wind resistance. It fits in my carry-on easily and doesnt break the bank like a Gitzo would! Pair it with the Leofoto LH-30 Low Profile Ball Head and you are golden. Seriously, you wont regret it! Have an amazing time in Iceland, it is literally a photographers dream!
Regarding what #1 said about honestly being right to be skeptical... I think the issue is often less about the brand and more about the actual tube diameters. I learned this the hard way during a shoot on a windy ridge last year. I had a lightweight carbon setup that was great for hiking, but it acted like a tuning fork in the wind. Even with my Nikon Z8, those thin lower leg sections just couldnt handle the vibration frequencies. A few things I learned from that failure:
Ngl this whole thread reminds me of a buddy of mine who went on a landscape mission to the Faroe Islands a few years back. Over the years Ive tried many setups but he was the guy who spent months studying damping coefficients and torsional rigidity data before buying anything. He finally settles on this ultra-sleek, high-spec carbon fiber rig that looked like it belonged in a museum. We get out to this cliffside and literally the first gust of wind catches his long lens like a sail. The tripod didnt even tip over... it just kinda twisted like a pretzel because the locks couldnt handle the torque. I ended up spending half my shooting time helping him secure the thing to a mossy rock with paracord and some heavy-duty gaffer tape we found in my bag. It was a total nightmare at the time tho we laugh about it now over drinks. Its wild how much the perfect specs on paper can just completely fall apart when youre actually out in the elements trying to keep a heavy body like the Z8 steady... sometimes physics just wins no matter what the marketing says.