Which landing pads ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Which landing pads are best for large DJI Enterprise drones?

10 Posts
11 Users
0 Reactions
57 Views
0
Topic starter

I've been flying for years but I just upgraded to the M350 RTK for solar farm inspections in Nevada and my old gear isnt cutting it. The prop wash on these enterprise motors is insane and just sends my old spring-loaded hobbyist pads flying across the desert, I'm worried about kicking up dust into the gimbal if I dont get a solid landing area.

I need something that:

  • stays pinned down without a million stakes
  • is big enough for the wide stance of the M300/350
  • actually fits in a truck bed

Budget is around $180 and I need it by next week. What are you guys using for the heavy lifters?

10 Answers
12

I've been using the Hoodman Launch Pad HD Weighted 5ft 150cm for about a year now with my M300 and its been rock solid in the high desert winds. I had that same issue with the prop wash... those enterprise motors push so much air that standard spring-loaded pads just fold. I remember one job near a solar array where my old hobbyist pad basically became a kite and nearly clipped my sensors. This Hoodman model is around 11 pounds and uses a weighted perimeter so you dont even need stakes for most flights. It keeps the gimbal out of the fine silt perfectly, which is a lifesaver for those expensive optics. I'm satisfied with the 5-foot diameter since it gives the M350 plenty of clearance for the landing gear. It collapses down into a carry bag that fits right in my truck bed without taking up space.

12

Re: "I've been using the Hoodman Launch Pad HD..."

  • Honestly wish I had seen that before I wasted my first hundred bucks. I had a really bad experience with a cheap thin mat that just folded in on itself... nearly clipped my gimbal because the prop wash from the M350 is just on another level. The consensus so far seems to be:
  • Hoodman is the pro choice but pricey
  • PGYTECH is too light for this specific drone
  • Weight is way more important than stakes I ended up grabbing the Heisener 55 inch Professional Weighted Landing Pad. Its disappointing that the carry case is so flimsy but the pad itself is decent for the price. It stays put without stakes and fits in the truck bed fine. Its a solid way to save cash while getting those weighted edges you need for the desert.




5

> my old gear isnt cutting it. The prop wash on these enterprise motors is insane To add to the point above: I unfortunately had a bad experience with the PGYTECH Drone Landing Pad Pro 110cm because it basically folded under the pressure. Tbh, for those Nevada solar farms, you need real mass. Check the GoProfessional Cases GPC Heavy Duty Landing Pad 4ft... it stays put without stakes. Its a bit pricier than nylon but wont fly away. Check the GPC site for their wind rating charts, they're pretty detailed.

5

I had such a bad experience with retail pads... they usually just turn into kites. Unfortunately, most of the stuff marketed as enterprise grade felt like a total letdown once those M350 motors started spinning up. If you want to keep the dust out of your gimbal in the desert, you really have to go heavy or go home. Adding my two cents on a DIY setup that actually survives:

3

> Weight is way more important than stakes Regarding what #3 said about weight - honestly, spot on. Staking into desert hardpan or loose sand is a nightmare and usually just fails when you need it most. I've been running the Ruggard Weighted Landing Pad 50 inch for my M300 and M350 fleet lately. It weighs about 10 pounds and uses a thick, heavy-duty material that doesnt flap around when those enterprise motors start pushing air. Quick tips for Nevada:

  • Watch the surface temp. High-temp desert ground can make cheaper plastic pads get tacky, but this heavy rubberized stuff holds up better.
  • Always fold it with the dirty side facing in so you dont get desert grit all over your truck bed. This one fits your 180 dollar budget easily and honestly feels more like a piece of industrial gear than a toy.




3

Building on the earlier suggestion, those weighted pads are absolutely amazing for stability, but man, after a decade of desert flying I've found that the really heavy ones can be a total nightmare to clean! I remember this one solar farm gig near Vegas where my heavy duty mat became a permanent dust magnet and made my truck smell like a dry lake bed for months. It was fantastic for the prop wash but such a pain for everything else! I love the idea of going heavy, but I'm curious... how much actual floor space do you have left in your truck bed once that massive M350 case is loaded in? And are you usually flying solo or do you have a crew to help lug the gear? Knowing that would really help narrow down if you need something foldable or a solid slab!

3

> Weight is way more important than stakes ^ This. Also, people really underestimate the physics of those 2110s propellers and the massive downwash they generate! I remember my first time testing the M350 out in the Mojave. I totally thought my heavy-duty rubber mat would be enough to handle the CFM, but the sheer downward force created this crazy low-pressure zone on the edges. The whole thing just rippled like a flag in a hurricane! It was wild to see the gimbal telemetry trying to compensate for the dust swirl. I learned the hard way that if the material density isnt high enough, it doesnt matter how many stakes you use because the center of the pad just lifts. My current setup is basically a heavy industrial-grade slab and it totally changed the game for my sensor health. Seeing the data logs show zero vibration errors during takeoff is just amazing! Honestly, keeping that gimbal clean is the difference between a successful scan and a total redo.

2

bump




1

Interested in this too

1

TIL! Thanks for sharing




Share:
Forum.Cameraegg.org is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.