Ive been shooting on Canon for years, started with the old 5D Mark II and finally jumped over to the R6 Mark II recently for most of my video work. I thought I had my audio workflow totally figured out since Ive been using a basic VideoMic Pro for forever, but Im running into this weird issue where the internal pre-amps on the mirrorless body seem... I dont know, way more sensitive or maybe just different than the old DSLRs? I was filming a segment for this local woodworker documentary Im doing here in Seattle last weekend and the hiss was just killing me in post. I had my levels set manually like always but it still sounded thin and noisy when things got quiet in the shop.
Ive got about $350 maybe $400 tops to spend on a new setup before the big interview day in two weeks. Im looking for something that plays nice with the Canon R system specifically because Ive heard some mics have better output levels for these specific bodies. I was looking at the Rode VideoMic NTG because of that gain knob on the back which seems useful for fine-tuning on the fly but then I saw some people talking about the Sennheiser MKE 600 with an XLR to 3.5mm adapter to get more of a professional sound. But then I worry about the weight on the hot shoe if Im doing handheld stuff and if itll be too front-heavy.
Is it better to stick with a shotgun mic that draws power from the camera or should I be looking at something with its own battery to keep the signal cleaner? I really need something that can handle the ambient noise of a workshop but still get clear voice without that digital floor noise creeping in. My old setup just isnt cutting it anymore with this new sensor and the way the R6 handles audio input. Does anyone have a specific recommendation for a mirrorless setup that actually sounds rich? Im trying to avoid carrying a separate Tascam recorder if I can help it because Im usually a one-man crew and syncing everything in Premiere is just another step I dont have time for right now. Which mic is actually the gold standard for these Canon mirrorless bodies lately?
> I was looking at the Rode VideoMic NTG because of that gain knob on the back which seems useful for fine-tuning on the fly but then I saw some people talking about the <a href=" https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt= Sennheiser+MKE+600+with+an+XLR&BI=8941&KBID=10361&SID=12345&DFF=d50" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored">Sennheiser MKE 600 with an XLR to 3.5mm adapter To add to the point above: I've actually been using the <a href=" https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt= Sennheiser+MKE+600+Shotgun+Microphone&BI=8941&KBID=10361&SID=12345&DFF=d50" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored">Sennheiser MKE 600 Shotgun Microphone for about a year now with my mirrorless setup and I'm very satisfied with how it handles voices. It definitely sounds more rich and natural compared to the smaller on-camera mics. Since you're doing a documentary in a shop, that extra reach helps a lot when you can't get the camera right in the woodworkers face. You mentioned the weight, and honestly, it's not that bad if you're used to the R6 II anyway. The key for me was using the <a href=" https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt= Sennheiser+KA+600+XLR+to+3.5mm+Adapter+Cable&BI=8941&KBID=10361&SID=12345&DFF=d50" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored">Sennheiser KA 600 XLR to 3.5mm Adapter Cable and always keeping a fresh AA battery in the mic. When you use the internal battery, it sends a much hotter signal. This lets you turn the Canon pre-amps way down which is basically the only way to escape that annoying hiss you're hearing. It's a huge time saver because it goes straight into the 3.5mm jack, so no syncing in post like you'd have with a Tascam. If you want something lighter though, I've had zero complaints with the <a href=" https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt= Sennheiser+MKE+400+On-Camera+Shotgun+Microphone&BI=8941&KBID=10361&SID=12345&DFF=d50" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored">Sennheiser MKE 400 On-Camera Shotgun Microphone. It's way more compact but still has a +20dB boost switch. I use that for handheld b-roll and then swap to the MKE 600 for the actual sitting interviews. Both are well within your $400 budget. Personally, I think <a href=" https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt= Sennheiser+just+handles+the+low&BI=8941&KBID=10361&SID=12345&DFF=d50" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored">Sennheiser just handles the low-end frequencies better for voice, makes it sound way less thin than the older VideoMics.
Honestly, I dealt with that same hiss on my R6 II until I switched to the Rode VideoMic NTG On-camera Shotgun Microphone. Over the years, I've tried many mics, and this one is the gold standard for your budget.
Regarding what #2 said about "> I was looking at the Rode VideoMic..." - yeah, its definitely a learning curve with these newer pre-amps. I had a similar panic when I moved over from my old setup. I kept thinking my gear was broken but it turns out I just needed to be way more conservative with how I was pushing the levels. I'm always a bit wary of spending too much right away before I really know how the camera behaves in different rooms, but you will definitely get the hang of it soon. Actually, this whole thing reminds me of when I first started doing video work back in college. I borrowed a bunch of expensive equipment for a project and was so terrified of breaking it that I barely used it. I ended up filming most of the documentary on a cheap little point-and-shoot I had in my bag. The professor actually liked that footage better because it looked more raw or whatever. It's kinda funny how we stress over the perfect audio floor today when back then I was just happy if the battery didnt die mid-interview. I still have that old camera in a box somewhere... probably should clear out my storage unit honestly. Anyway, sticking to a budget is definitely smart while you're still figuring out the R system's quirks. I can try to dig up my old settings notes if you need them later.
Following this thread