I'm torn between the 28-75mm G2 and the 28-200mm superzoom. Usually Im an f2.8 guy but having that reach without swapping lenses sounds great. My budget is around $1000 so I could maybe swing a small prime too. Is the image quality on the 28-200 actually good enough for that 33MP sensor or am I gonna regret not having the constant aperture for night street shots?

im getting really frustrated because every time i google something i get more confused like what is a 28-75 vs a 28-200 and why does one cost way more if the numbers are smaller?? i just want to take nice pictures of the buildings in Rome and maybe some food shots without having to carry a giant suitcase of gear around all day. im really worried im gonna buy the wrong thing and waste my money and then have blurry photos of the coliseum. it feels like i need a degree just to buy a piece of glass.

here is what im dealing with:

• i can only spend like 800 maybe 900 dollars max because i still have to pay for hotels and stuff


• we leave in three weeks so i need to order it like yesterday so i can practice


• i want one lens that does everything because i dont know how to change them fast and i dont want to get dust inside the camera


• it needs to be light enough to carry for 10 miles a day because we are walking everywhere

sorry if this is a stupid question but i literally dont know where to start and the more youtube videos i watch the more i feel like i should have just stayed with my iphone lol. does anyone have a suggestion for which tamron one is the easiest for a total beginner who just wants pretty travel photos? i keep seeing the 28-200 mentioned but then people say the 28-75 is better for blurry backgrounds and my head is spinning...

My constraints:

• Budget is strictly under $1900 for this one lens


• Needs to be sharp enough for those big 24x36 prints


• Weight matters but I'll sacrifice some for that f2.0 if its actually worth it


• Autofocus has to keep up with erratic kids on the dance floor

Is the 35-150mm too heavy for an 8 hour day? I usually carry two bodies but if that lens can do it all maybe I can simplify. Or should I just stick to the classic 28-75 and save some cash for a prime?...

my budget is strictly under 800 bucks so i can only get one and i dont have time to return it if i hate it. which one is gonna be less of a headache for a week of non-stop walking and shooting?

Im doing a wedding in Colorado in about three weeks and I really need a one-lens solution if possible because hiking up to the ceremony spot with a huge bag is just not happening. I saw the 28-75mm too but people keep saying its just the old Nikon design rebranded or something? Or is it the actual G2 optics? Im getting really anxious about the shipping times and making the wrong choice before the trip starts. My requirements are pretty strict:

• Must be under $1500


• Fast enough for a dim reception (f2.8 minimum)


• Fast AF tracking for the walk down the aisle

I really dont want to deal with an FTZ adapter anymore if I can help it. Does the 70-180mm make more sense or should I just stick to the 35-150 range and suck up the weight...

I did some digging and everyone points to the Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 as the ultimate do-it-all lens but then I saw some forum posts saying it might not be sharp enough for that 40 megapixel sensor the X-T5 has and that kinda makes me nervous because whats the point of a high res body if the glass cant keep up? I also looked at the 17-70mm f/2.8 which seems way better for low light and sharper but then I lose all that reach for far away architecture or street details.

Here is what I am looking for:

• Budget is around $700-$800 max


• Mostly travel photography and some street stuff at night


• Needs to be light enough for 10 mile walking days


• Ideally no lens swapping because I hate getting dust on the sensor

Is the 18-300mm actually good enough for the X-T5 or will it look all mushy when I zoom in? I keep seeing conflicting stuff online about whether it can handle the resolution. Or maybe the 17-70 is the smarter play even if I lose the zoom range...

My budget is probably around 800 or maybe 900 dollars if I can find a good deal on a used one because I already spent so much on the camera body itself. I was looking at some of their lenses online and I keep seeing people talk about the 28-75mm or the 70-180mm but I dont know if those even fit on my Z6 without some kind of adapter thingy. Do I need that FTZ adapter everyone talks about or does Tamron make stuff that just clicks right on to the Z mount? I keep hearing that the Z mount is different so I dont want to buy the wrong thing and have it arrive two days before the party and not work.

I really want the photos to look sharp and not all blurry because of the low light in the reception hall. I think the ceiling is pretty high too so I cant just use a flash and bounce it off anything. Is there one specific Tamron zoom that is like the gold standard for this kind of thing for someone who is just starting out and doesnt want to mess up their first big gig? Like is there one that covers enough ground so I dont have to keep switching back and forth? I really want to do a good job for my cousin but the more I read the more I feel like I know nothing at all...

I started looking at Tamron since they finally have native Z mounts but im torn between the 70-180mm f2.8 or maybe the 35-150 if I can find a deal. Is the 70-180mm actually good for that creamy bokeh falloff on the Z6 or am I better off looking at something else?